Newsletters | Request Trial | Log in | Advertise | Digital Issue   |   Search
  • CCUS
  • Cap & Trade Markets
  • Voluntary Markets & Offsets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Net Zero Strategies
  • Podcasts
Search
The potential market for DAC is huge
Energy transition Carbon capture
Killian Staines
29 November 2022
Follow @PetroleumEcon
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

Direct air capture must cut costs to succeed

Project developers believe dramatic reductions are possible, but only with global policy support

Direct air capture (DAC) of carbon dioxide will need to realise major cost reductions if it is to play a role in the energy transition. But the potential market is enormous, and increased tax credits could kickstart the industry in the US. The IEA’s Net Zero by 2050 scenario sees DAC removing 60mn t/yr of CO₂ by 2030 and 980mn t/yr by 2050. But in September, the agency reported there were just 18 operational plants with a combined capacity of 0.01mn t/yr. The IEA sees a pipeline of just 5.5mn t/yr of projects in advanced development, with a further 38.7mn t/yr in the early stages. The organisation still believes 60mn t/yr of capacity by 2030 is achievable but says this will require several a

Also in this section

Share PDF with colleagues

COPYRIGHT NOTICE: PDF sharing is permitted internally for Petroleum Economist Gold Members only. Usage of this PDF is restricted by <%= If(IsLoggedIn, User.CompanyName, "")%>’s agreement with Petroleum Economist – exceeding the terms of your licence by forwarding outside of the company or placing on any external network is considered a breach of copyright. Such instances are punishable by fines of up to US$1,500 per infringement
Send

Forward article Link

Send
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Project Data
Maps
Podcasts
Social Links
Featured Video
Home
  • About us
  • Subscribe
  • Reaching your audience
  • PE Store
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws © 2025 The Petroleum Economist Ltd
Cookie Settings
;

Search