Subscribe | Register | Log in | Advertise | Digital Issue   |   Search
  • CCUS
  • Cap & Trade Markets
  • Voluntary Markets & Offsets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Net Zero Strategies
Search
Related Articles
CBL exchange eyes growing share of offset trade
Exchange traded volumes rising as voluntary carbon market matures, CBL’s parent company Xpansiv tells Carbon Economist
EU ETS revisions close to becoming law
Final shape of the law endorsed by European Parliament with only EU Council endorsement remaining
BP softens emissions goals in push for ‘orderly’ transition
Oil and gas major revises down scope three targets as it plans slower reductions in oil and gas production to 2030
Nature-based carbon offset momentum defies critics
A recent trend towards offset crediting at a jurisdictional level is raising funds at a much larger scale than traditional project-based programmes
Offset oversupply threatens carbon removal tech
Surplus offsets in voluntary carbon market could depress prices to 2050 and deter investment in more expensive removal methods, says BloombergNEF
Offsets standards body refutes media’s Redd+ claims
Studies underpinning recent reports are flawed, according to technical review published by Verra
Deep emissions cuts drive CCUS to emerging economies – BP
India and China lead CCUS deployment under optimistic emissions reduction scenarios set out by oil major
Core carbon principles could boost voluntary market
Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market to launch finalised Core Carbon Principles for credit programmes and projects, the body’s chair tells Carbon Economist
Abu Dhabi steps on the emissions-reduction accelerator
State-owned energy companies are intensifying efforts to decarbonise the emirate’s crude oil production and carve out a leading role in the nascent global hydrogen trade
Voluntary market set to embrace removals
Carbon-removal technologies to gain market share as companies fret over quality of credits generated by avoidance projects, according to Shell and BCG
Various different methodologies exist for calculating avoided deforestation
Carbon offsets Emissions
Tom Young
1 February 2023
Follow @PetroleumEcon
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

Offsets standards body refutes media’s Redd+ claims

Studies underpinning recent reports are flawed, according to technical review published by Verra

Recent media reports claiming carbon offsets generated by projects using the UN-backed Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (Redd+) mechanism are “largely worthless” include numerous inaccuracies and distortions, according to a technical review published by non-profit carbon offsets standards body Verra. The original analysis undertaken by the UK’s Guardian newspaper, German weekly Die Zeit and non-profit investigative journalism organisation Sourcematerial claims that 94pc of the rainforest offset credits approved by Verra do not represent genuine reductions in emissions. The Guardian investigation analysed the findings of three scientific studies that used a relativ

Also in this section
Outlook 2024: Negative energy pricing strategies to capitalise on flexibility assets
Outlook 2024
30 November 2023
Negative pricing has become more frequent in European energy markets, and GB markets are now experiencing a similar increase
China signals ETS expansion
29 November 2023
Preparations underway for inclusion of cement, aluminium and steel producers in world’s largest compliance market by 2030
EU sets sights on pan-European CCS network
28 November 2023
European Commission earmarks cross-border projects for funding and fast-tracks carbon management strategy as pressure grows to kickstart CCS sector
The need for ambition and more action on the energy transition in tougher times
Outlook 2024
27 November 2023
Progress in decarbonisation but significant challenges lie ahead

Share PDF with colleagues

COPYRIGHT NOTICE: PDF sharing is permitted internally for Petroleum Economist Gold Members only. Usage of this PDF is restricted by <%= If(IsLoggedIn, User.CompanyName, "")%>’s agreement with Petroleum Economist – exceeding the terms of your licence by forwarding outside of the company or placing on any external network is considered a breach of copyright. Such instances are punishable by fines of up to US$1,500 per infringement
Send

Forward article Link

Send
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Project Data
Maps
PE Store
Social Links
Featured Video
Home
  • About us
  • Subscribe
  • Reaching your audience
  • PE Store
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws © 2023 The Petroleum Economist Ltd
;

Search