Newsletters | Request Trial | Log in | Advertise | Digital Issue   |   Search
  • Upstream
  • Midstream & Downstream
  • Gas & LNG
  • Trading & Markets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Geopolitics
  • Podcasts
Search
Related Articles
Letter from Canada: Federal government attempts emissions strategy
Federal carbon pricing options may allow the central government to outflank provincial opposition
Letter from Australia: Labor victory positive for CCS
Australia’s upstream industry could be poised to benefit from the election of a Labor government for the first time in almost a decade
Tide turns for middle distillates
Strong prices for middle distillates might persist due to a range of supply and demand factors
CO2 shrugs off the Covid-19 slump
Future policy assumptions support the EU ETS after initial hit
Preparing the US for the energy transition
Former President Obama special assistant Jason Bordoff says that government and industry need to work together to tackle climate change
Canada divided by carbon conundrum
Canada’s plans for raising carbon tax face mounting political and popular opposition
WGC 2018: gas faces political, environmental risks
Natural gas may be the best solution to emissions goals, but the world needs to be convinced, say industry heads
Carbon permits: The burning issue
Carbon floor price or free market? Europe's debate shows no signs of calming
Carbon permits
Alessandro Vitelli
23 November 2017
Follow @PetroleumEcon
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

Carbon permits: The burning issue

Carbon floor price or free market? Europe's debate shows no signs of calming

For more than a decade Europe's carbon market has been at the centre of a debate on whether a trading emissions system is more effective than taxation. Even as ambitious efforts to reform the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) near completion, critics say setting a floor price for carbon would lead to greater reductions. Since 2007, the EU ETS built up an oversupply of EU allowances (EUAs) that at its peak was around 2bn tonnes, or the equivalent of a year's worth of emissions from the entire market. Prices plunged from nearly €30 ($/35.39) per tonne in 2008 to €2.46/tonne in April 2013, leading many critics to claim that low prices had removed all incentives to cut climate pollution. The

Also in this section
The illusion of supply: Rethinking energy security when oil cannot move
16 April 2026
Demand for oil is falling because supply cannot meet it, not because it is no longer required
Letter on Africa: Cutting methane can ease Africa’s energy crunch
Opinion
16 April 2026
The continent has an immediate opportunity to make the most of its energy resources by capturing gas that is currently slipping away
Letter from Europe: Energy transition meets reality
Opinion
15 April 2026
The continent is seeing political pushback to climate plans, corporate reassessment of transition goals and rising supply risk in a fractured global order
Is this nuclear power’s big moment?
15 April 2026
The Middle East energy crisis may turn out to be pivotal to the industry’s long-term expansion, but significant challenges still stand in its way

Share PDF with colleagues

COPYRIGHT NOTICE: PDF sharing is permitted internally for Petroleum Economist Gold Members only. Usage of this PDF is restricted by <%= If(IsLoggedIn, User.CompanyName, "")%>’s agreement with Petroleum Economist – exceeding the terms of your licence by forwarding outside of the company or placing on any external network is considered a breach of copyright. Such instances are punishable by fines of up to US$1,500 per infringement
Send

Forward article Link

Send
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Project Data
Maps
Podcasts
Social Links
Featured Video
Home
  • About us
  • Subscribe
  • Reaching your audience
  • PE Store
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws © 2025 The Petroleum Economist Ltd
Cookie Settings
;

Search