Rising political interventions in oil and gas markets
From deglobalisation to potential shortages, policymakers must be mindful of the law of unintended consequences
The COVID-19 pandemic led to more government intervention in energy markets in economies across the globe. Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, state involvement—from sanctions to price caps—became even more intensive, upending global oil and gas flows, and not necessarily in ways desired or intended. Getting the right policy balance is at the heart of good energy policy. Examples of ‘bad’ government intervention are efforts to influence energy prices, often leading to adverse impacts. Attempts to cap prices fall into this category. Legislating limits to energy prices only leads to reduced incentive to provide more energy and encourages waste. Aggressive price freezes and caps can lead
Also in this section
28 April 2026
Oil traders warning of $200/bl oil are wrong, and the market should be wary of proclamations that the impact of the oil shortage has only begun to be felt and a that a ‘harsh adjustment’ is coming—even for industrialised nations
28 April 2026
Restoring supply from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and Iraq involves complexities far beyond simply adjusting operational controls
28 April 2026
Datacentres will guzzle power at a ferocious rate, but the impact on wider energy markets will be far more complex than previously thought
28 April 2026
The key energy player faces balancing regional routes, political complexities, and creating a clear strategic vision for energy security







